Background
Photographs are the lasting record of your big day, so choosing the right
person to produce them is crucial. There is no shortage of wedding photographers
out there. Some are part-time, others full-time; some come with professional
accreditation from one association or another, others do not; one photographer
appears to have reasonable charges while offering you the moon, another charges
you the earth yet offers what seems like an economised package. How do you
decide? Portfolio
There is a tendency for some couples to be so concerned about the details of the print package that they lose sight of the quality of the photography. My past experience as a talent scout for a large picture agency educated me in what to recognise when looking at a photographer's portfolio. Here are some of the most important things to keep an eye out for:
An experienced photographer will often remain quiet while their portfolio is
under review, giving potential clients a chance to breathe; to step into his or
her shoes and see what he or she sees. Look at the work - really look at
the work - and decide if it speaks for itself. If it does, you are ready to move
on to the next stage of the discussion - the fees. Fees
A photographer will price an assignment based on their overhead, what they would like to make per year, and their skill level. Deducing whether you are getting a good fee for a good photographer entails judging the quality of their work, their experience, their creativity, their problem-solving abilities, and the service they offer. Fee structures generally fall into one of two schools: those offering set portfolio packages and those offering bespoke pricing. There is no right or wrong here - it is a matter of what you feel comfortable with. The bespoke client prefers the opportunity to mix and match, have some input themselves and be charged for precisely what they request, while the package person is happy to fit in with a set offering. Whichever pricing system you go with, make sure you are happy with the quality and level of experience of the photographer. I have heard of at least one 'experienced' photographer whose move into digital photography meant that he could offer a range of seductive options - websites, enlargements, CD-burning, copyright - but at the expense of his creative quality. His images were formulaic, dull and lacking in atmosphere. Watch out for that sort of photographer. Extras and big prints are useless if the work is dead and uninspiring, so, while getting a variety of quotes is always a good idea, make sure you match the fee to the work, and do not be seduced by all the extras if the work does not stand out. A word on websites acting as marketing material to promote a photographer.
When viewing work on a website, look carefully at the pictures themselves and
try to separate them from the 'packaging' which may help to promote the work.
Rapport
You like their portfolio and the price seems right, but you don't feel they
are quite 'there' with you; there is no 'click'. First, ask yourself first why
this may be. Is it something you can get over, or is it deeply intuitive?
To help steer communication in a clear manner, a photographer should keep up to date with the details of your day, and should provide a contract or terms in which they sum up what is expected of them. This should state:
Agreeing this a few months in advance means that client and photographer are moving towards the same goal - everything running smoothly on the day that counts, and the resulting images being the best they possibly can be. Karl Grupe is a member of our forums (screen name karlgrupe) and is available to help out with your questions. To comment on this article or read other people's thoughts, just click here |




